Search for: "Rapp v Rapp" Results 81 - 100 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether he incurred damages by submitting evidentiary proof that, but for the defendant's alleged negligence, he would have been able to negotiate a more favorable settlement (see Rapp v Lauer, 229 AD2d 383, 384; Rogers v Ettinger, 163 AD2d 257, 258). [read post]
27 May 2021, 12:31 pm by Steve Lubet
I was born in San Antonio, Texas, when Plessy v Ferguson was still good law. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am by Cody Poplin
” Wells Bennett linked us to an interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am by Lawfare Staff
  Analysis, Commentary, and Additional Information Mira Rapp-Hooper recaps recent American efforts to confront the PRC [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
"[F]undamental fairness suggests that defendants are prejudiced when 'required to defend [themselves] publicly before a jury while plaintiff[s] make accusations from behind a cloak of anonymity.'" Rapp v. [read post]