Search for: "Real Estate Listing Service, Inc. v. Real Estate Commission" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(list updated Oct. 19, 2009)To wit: THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW WERE DENIED OCT 16, 2009: 09-0575 BOBBY FERACHI v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Friends of the Santa Clara River v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
A missing apostrophe in a Facebook post could cost real estate agent Anthony Zadravic thousands of dollars after a court ruled a defamation case against him could proceed. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
  After a year of delays, the Secret Service provided Leopold 40 pages about the interview with the real Slim Shady, including a note that he was “exhibiting inappropriate behavior. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
  After a year of delays, the Secret Service provided Leopold 40 pages about the interview with the real Slim Shady, including a note that he was “exhibiting inappropriate behavior. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
LANE, Appellees. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Foreign corporations -- Service of process on defendant corporation quashed -- Plaintiff attempted to perform substitute service pursuant to incorrect Florida long arm jurisdiction statute -- Further, plaintiff did not strictly comply with requirements for substituted service against domestic corporation, which requires notification by registered or certified mail to defendant after… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess,… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]