Search for: "Reed v. High"
Results 81 - 100
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
” [63] (Lord Neuberger and Lord Judge: Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Reed agreed) The decision of the Divisional Court Now the appeal in Beghal brings the issue squarely before the Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
One of those laws formed the basis of the controversy in Omaha Healthcare LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:45 pm
(Dale Carpenter) Yesterday, in Doe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:02 am
She held that the legal hurdle for implying a term in English law is a high one and was not met in this case. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Sumption and Lord Reed gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am
The second challenge was dismissed in October 2014 by the High Court, but permission was given for the decisions in both Unison 1 and Unison 2 to come before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
(See generally 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:17 am
Supreme Court recently made clear in Reed v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
(Lehmann's case is reported in the High Command Case, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:03 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 am
The dissenting judge’s believed the appeal should not have been allowed as to not to look or to knowingly run into the path of the car displayed a very high degree of carelessness. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
" I expected to see detailed consideration of the "honest practices in industrial and commercial matters" proviso, as in Volvo v Heritage, but the judge wasn't asked to get into that.Regarding the passing-off claims, these stood or fell with the trade mark claims, and the judge explained the connection between the two which strikes me as an interesting point: Had I found that the message conveyed by TLL’s use of its roundel and the M logo signs in each… [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:10 am
In October 2022, the High Court in KeyHealth Medical Scheme v Ngoepe No and Others considered whether the court a quo was correct in finding that a medical scheme was prohibited from using day-to-day benefits to fund the treatment and costs of Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) conditions. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 3:01 am
In the case of Moffitt v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm
… It may be that Ms Wilson is correct to assert that the reality of the reporting may be less high minded than that contemplated in argument by Mr Farmer and Ms Tickle. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
[1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v… [read post]
