Search for: "Reply in Support" Results 81 - 100 of 8,818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2008, 7:21 pm
We've got a copy of the Reply Brief filed by defendant Wyeth in the Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 6:28 am by Ron Coleman
The post THE SLANTS trademark: The CAFC reply brief appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:30 pm
Licata, the Cincinnati "throwing in the towel" case, David Licata has filed reply papers in support of his objection to the Magistrate's recommendation that he not be awarded attorneys fees, following the RIAA's withdrawal of its case, responding to the RIAA's opposition papers.RIAA Response to ObjectionsDefendant's Reply Memorandum in Support of Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling*-->* Document published online at… [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:18 pm by Patent Docs
In its brief in support of its Miscellaneous Motion No. 2, CVC argued that four prior art references should not be considered by the Board because they were not cited in any... [read post]
27 Sep 2004, 1:09 pm
One of the questions that has been looming is whether the Solicitor General will reply merely to the arguments raised in the respondents' briefs or whether it will address the arguments in the briefs submitted in support of respondents by amici. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Several reasons support this conclusion, and we think that this interpretation will provide a brighter and fairer line for lawyers who send and receive group emails or text messages. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 3:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
” On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed this holding — concluding instead that the reply brief did not offer a new argument:  “Its reply still asserted that claims 6–9 would have been obvious over Hirsch and Martin [and] relies on the same algorithm from the same prior art reference to support the same legal argument: that Martin discloses the … “future minimum” limitations of the asserted claims. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 12:58 pm by Theodore R. Flo
On December 29, 2017, the Lower East Side People’s Credit Union (“People’s”) filed a reply brief in support of its preliminary injunction motion in which it seeks to block the appointment of Mick Mulvaney as the Acting CFPB Director. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am by Florian Mueller
Google Android/Java copyright appeal became available: Google's reply brief concerning the smaller items with respect to which the district court had found it liable for infringement. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:24 pm
  Thanks to this page at the Office of Defender Services, you can access the reply brief for Mario Claiborne here and the reply brief for Victor Rita here. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Tenenbaum, the defendant has filed reply papers arguing that Matthew Oppenheim's deposition has been properly noticed.Defendant's motion for leave to file reply brief in support of motion to compel Matthew Oppenheim depositionDefendant's reply in support of motion to compel Matthew Oppenheim depositionExhibit AExhibit BExhibit CExhibit D*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary &… [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv 64-nm-motion-to-stay 65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order 66-response-to-60 69-nm-motion-to-modify 71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv 72-motion-to-dismiss-count-ii 73-motion-to-dismiss-count-v 79-reply-in-support-of-60 85-response-to-65 86-response-to-72 87-response-to-71 88-response-to-69 89-response-to-73 90-response-to-64 94-reply-in-support-of-69 95-reply-in-support-of-73… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:34 am by K&L Gates
As expected, on March 19, 2012, plaintiffs in this case filed their Reply in Support of Rule 72(a) Objection to Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 8, 2012 Discovery Rulings. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:34 am by Adil Ahmad Haque
The response lacks legal substance and warrants only a brief reply. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the students have filed a reply memorandum of law in support of their motion to quash.Among other things, defendants argued:Plaintiffs .... point to this Court's granting of their ex parte request for discovery as proof of the facial validity of their claims, but this argument cannot be taken seriously. [read post]