Search for: "Reply in Support of Motion for the Release of Court Records"
Results 81 - 100
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
In the new motion on Circuit panel assignment, detainees’ lawyers argued that only the earlier panel could cut through new allegations by the Justice Department that the 17 are terrorists — claims that the detainees’ lawyers said “have never been made in any court before, anywhere” and are not supported by anything in the records of their cases. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8019, the Court has examined the briefs and record and determined that oral argument is unnecessary because “the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Defendant provided no other affidavits or documentary proof to support his motion. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Department of Defense, Planning and Execution Timeline (released on Jan. 8, 2021) 6. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:24 am
{The Court's ruling at the motion-to-dismiss stage, however, necessarily occurs without the benefit of a full record. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:38 am
The trial judge “imposed the agreed-upon sentence of eight years with a release eligibility of thirty-five percent. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
" Similarly, records from the Missing Child organization indi [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm
The stress and lack of support for our own community really hurt Crystal. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
” An agent replied, “Yes, that is correct. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:09 pm
The necessary findings to support the continuation of the delinquency proceeding shall be reduced to writing and made part of the court record. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
Judge Fine replied: Okay. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:13 am
Modricker doubled down in his reply: “if one logo [disparages] another logo than it would be infringement. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Trump, Case No.: 1:23-cv-03773 (civil removal proceedings) Trump notice of appeal to 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (July 28, 2023) Order and opinion denying Trump motion to remove and granting State of New York motion to remand (July 19, 2023) Order regulating removal evidentiary hearing (June 23, 2023) State of New York memorandum of law in support of its reply in support of its motion to remand (June 23, 2023) Joint letter in agreement… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Although Holland had repeatedly written to Collins asking about the state court proceedings and the AEDPA limitations period, and had instructed him to file his federal petition before the limitation period expired, Collins nonetheless failed to file a timely federal habeas petition and failed to even tell Holland that the Florida Supreme Court had released its decision affirming the denial of Holland’s motion. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
After reviewing the record, the Court concluded: From our careful review of the record, and with appropriate deference to the trial court’s assessment of the witnesses’ credibility, the factual finding that Mother coerced Son into making the abuse allegations is also supported by the preponderance of the evidence in the record. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
In reply to this argument, the petitioner draws a distinction between the two requests, noting that responding to the government’s “massive” return required additional, and that he could not have foreseen this need when he opposed the government’s motion weeks before. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm
This response was in reply to the Justice Department's Aug. 30 filing opposing Trump's Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Presumably, the preference was to return to the district court, where the government could introduce evidence into the record to support the legality of the policy. [read post]
