Search for: "Restoration v. State Farm"
Results 81 - 100
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Maybe paternalistic central planning cannot tolerate parallel state law efforts to restore state lands. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
The church didn't raise a claim under the New Mexico Religious Freedom Restoration Act, perhaps because federal courts aren't allowed to order state officials to follow state law. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:30 pm
King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 10:13 am
Cook Cty., (SWANCC) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 pm
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
Supreme Court case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:54 pm
Miller v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
We cite Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:37 am
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:11 am
Plaintiff has to show by clear and convincing evidence that his mind was “so affected as to render him wholly and absolutely incompetent to comprehend and understand the nature of the transaction” (Sears v First Pioneer Farm Credit, ACA, 46 AD3d 1282, 1284-1285 [3d Dept 2007] quoting Aldrich v Bailey, 132 NY 85, 89 [1892]). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The ESA should be amended to restore a provision requiring 24 hours’ notice to employees of a change to a shift or work schedule unless the change: (a) will entitle the employees to overtime pay; (b) is an extension of a shift prior to the end of the shift; or (c) must be made with less than 24 [minority: 48] hours’ notice because of unforeseen circumstances. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The ESA should be amended to restore a provision requiring 24 hours’ notice to employees of a change to a shift or work schedule unless the change: (a) will entitle the employees to overtime pay; (b) is an extension of a shift prior to the end of the shift; or (c) must be made with less than 24 [minority: 48] hours’ notice because of unforeseen circumstances. [read post]
