Search for: "Reynolds v. State of Ohio" Results 81 - 100 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
JURIST reports on the Court’s refusal on Monday to stay the execution of an Ohio inmate challenging the state’s single-drug lethal injection procedure. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 908 P.2d 1095, 1104 (Colo. 1995); Garcia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is whether a state law forbidding that certain state claims be decided in a class action is procedural, so that it does not apply in federal court. ------- Title: Kucana v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
In 1999, Wilford Berry was killed by lethal injection, the first person murdered by the state of Ohio in 36 years. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
Retailer Name Street Address City State 1 Yoss Thriftway Old 71 Highway P.O. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:08 am
Heller (Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 69, No. 671, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm
Ohio," which extended the federal exclusionary rule to state courts. [read post]