Search for: "Ricci, in Re"
Results 81 - 100
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 6:23 pm
For a case out of little Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:19 pm
What a perfect storm: Madoff, Ricci, Nacchio, Michael Jackson and a documentary about Hillary Clinton. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
It reasoned that “[e]videntiary support for the conclu-sion that remedial action is warranted becomes crucial when the re-medial program is challenged in court by nonminority employees. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:20 am
The decision in Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:59 am
While everyone is talking about Ricci and Madoff, the story that interests me is Justice Souter's last day on the bench. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 1:05 pm
The Court's expected to issue the Ricci opinion tomorrow! [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Here's the crisis issue, they're trying to pack the courts with Federalists. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:03 am
In some Supreme Court non-news, the Ricci case, involving the complaint of the white firefighters in New Haven, did not come down today. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 1:21 pm
Related posts:NJ City Councilman Arrested for Urinating On Concertgoers From Balcony Steve LipsFriday News – No Mistrial in Stevens Case, OJ Case to Jury, New Solicitor General Garre Confirmed Ted StevenPSU’s Appellate Clinic files SC amicus brief in Ricci v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:18 am
UPDATED 6/16/09 While all eyes are on the Ricci v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
While the alleged non compliance with the New York statute may seem insignificant (1) non compliance is symbolic (2) the statute exists for a reason and (3) the correction to each website to bring it in compliance requires minimal action.I strongly suggest that each and every member of the NSSTA re-read Principle VI of the NSSTA code of Ethics and the asterisked paragraph of my email to Durbin/Ricci. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:06 pm
We're not sure if we'd call it "bizarre and unexpected," but it would be surprising. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
” “And besides you probably did what she said you did because you’re a male and nobody would believe you anyway. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
What you're saying is that the department can engage in intentional discrimination to avoid concern that they will be sued under disparate impact. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:13 am
There is no real argument, other than one steeped in empathy for Ricci, that could dictate a decision in favor of Ricci. [read post]
30 May 2009, 9:24 pm
No matter your feelings on Judge Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court, if you're reading this blog, chances are that you're well aware how badly the Ricci case has been portrayed in the press. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:48 pm
., who has led the more conservative bench toward a sweeping re-examination of government reliance on racial classifications, whether in school desegregation plans or landmark voting rights laws. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
At the moment, the case that seems to be gathering the most attention is an unpublished 2008 per curiam opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:06 am
(See also Ricci, in which SS was not nearly active enough for some.) [read post]
