Search for: "Rice v. Greene" Results 81 - 100 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 9:14 pm by JP
 The first successful challenge of a pipeline companies unfettered right to claim "common carrier" status is  Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am by Don Cruse
Private pipelines: Eminent domain cannot be used for purely private use Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:35 am by John McFarland
  And in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Kendall Gray
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:20 am by Alan Ackerman
In Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v Denbury Green Pipeline, issued on August 26, 2011, the Supreme Court of Texas apparently is following long standing public policy limiting pipeline companies to act in a capacity of a public use when acquiring property. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 3:33 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) In a potentially important recent decision, Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Siemens (Green Patent Blog) Smith & Wesson – ALJ Rogers sets target date in Certain Muzzle-Loading Firearms (337-TA-777) (ITC Law Blog) Wham-O – FLFMC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
Greene (p. 38-9) BC Historical News, v. 36, no. 4, Fall 2003. [read post]