Search for: "Richard Lawrence Long" Results 81 - 100 of 382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, and Richard Wolf at USA Today. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:22 pm by Howard Bashman
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Trump appointees hold keys in Supreme Court immigration case. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Federal regulatory policy has long divided policymakers. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
The law could revert to a state long ago rejected, and rejected for good reason. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  While Hoskins involved an individual foreign defendant, the Second Circuit’s decision has implications for foreign corporations, which are also covered by the FCPA.[3]  This case has been long-anticipated for its potential to proscribe the reach of the FCPA to foreign actors,[4] and will provide greater clarity to foreign companies that are trying to determine whether to take advantage of the DOJ’s FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.[5]   Background The defendant… [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Either way, Kavanaugh “may not have to wait too long for controversial cases if he is confirmed to the job, with disputes involving abortion, immigration, gay rights, voting rights and transgender troops possibly heading toward the justices soon,” report Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung for Reuters. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Bunkley, also a recent 6th Circuit opinion, Thapar wrote for a panel that affirmed an upward variance from the sentencing guidelines for a “large-scale, life-long d [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
” Seven years later, the court – again, by a vote of 6-3 – ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The justices did not add any cases to their merits docket, but they did issue a long-awaited ruling in Azar v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Elizabeth Lowman at Jurist, Jamie Dupree at AJC, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, and Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[t]he Supreme Court in recent years has been a firm defender of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[m]illions of workers routinely sign such arbitration agreements unknowingly, only to find out later that they are barred from collective action. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the court “avoided an upheaval in the way patent disputes can be resolved out of court by siding with regulators over judges. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he drive by cash-strapped state governments to collect more sales taxes from online retailers ran into skepticism,” as the justices “voiced concern about changing long-established rules of interstate commerce. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Evelyn Douek
Jonathan Zittrain long ago wrote about the many problems that can arise from the “perfect enforcement” of laws that is enabled when “code is law,” to use Lawrence Lessig’s formulation: that is, when rules can be embedded in the hidden architectures created by code. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm by Guest Blogger
This process of course was long in the making. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that in Benisek v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, who offers some possible explanations for why it took the justices so long to dispose of this request. [read post]