Search for: "Riley Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2018, 11:46 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Howard Barrett, No. 113,767 (Riley)Direct appeal (petition for review); Second-degree murderMichelle A. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Jones (holding that installation of a GPS device on a target's vehicle constituted a search), and Riley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Jonathan Hafetz is a senior staff attorney in the Center for Democracy at the American Civil Liberties Union and a professor of law at Seton Hall Law School. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:41 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Rather, Carpenter is the second in a series of decisions penned by Chief Justice John Roberts (the first being Riley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
  Most observers understandably have focused on two major aspects of the ruling:(i) The Court held that customers have at least some "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the cell-site location information (CSLI) records that their service providers maintain about them--a new "exception" to the so-called "third-party doctrine," and thus a repudiation of the principle the Court announced in Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
United States (which held that warrant was required for the government to use a thermal imaging device on a home) and Riley v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am by Matthew Kahn
On Wednesday, NSA General Counsel Glenn Gerstell delivered the following remarks at the Georgetown Cybersecurity Law Institute in a speech entitled “Failing to Keep Pace: The Cyber Threat and Its Implications for Our Privacy Laws. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Karla General, Angela Riley, Terri Smith, Se-ah-dom Edmo, and Josh Clause [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) (application of public accommodations statute violated the First Amendment where it "had the effect of declaring the sponsors' speech itself to be the public accommodation," thus infringing on parade organizers' "autonomy to choose the content of [their] own message"); see also Riley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:23 am by adam
Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Riley v. [read post]