Search for: "Robert A Espinoza"
Results 81 - 100
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 2:33 pm
Only one is outstanding: Espinoza. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:37 am
Saiger, School Funding Under the Neutrality Principle: Notes on a Post-Espinoza Future, (88 Fordham L. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
[My prediction: Roberts for Title VII, Roberts for DACA, and Roberts for Espinoza, and Roberts for Tax Return Cases] The Supreme Court generally gives each Justice roughly the same number of majority opinions. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The school funding dispute in Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:57 am
This term, the Court will decide a case on Blaine Amendments, Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court] From Peace Cross to Espinoza: where religious exercise and the Establishment Clause are headed in the Roberts Court [Federalist Society conference panel video and transcript with Stephanie Barclay, Luke Goodrich, Micah Schwartzman, and William P. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
At Law & Liberty (via How Appealing), John McGinnis explains why a holding in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
Nixon and the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson to conclude that Chief Justice John Roberts’ role in presiding over the trial of President Donald Trump will likely wrap up this week without fanfare or hurdles for the chief justice. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
” At Verdict, Michael Dorf considers “how much freedom” Montana has to “level down” – that is, deny benefits to all groups when confronted with allegations of discrimination arising from unequal treatment – “in response to a finding of impermissible discrimination” in Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
The Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm
As the first substantive day of the impeachment trial wore on, and on, from yesterday into the early morning hours of today, one cable-TV pundit suggested that Chief Justice John Roberts might not feel compelled to attend today’s oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
Espinoza asked the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
This morning the justices will close out the January session with one oral argument, in Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
Briefly: At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]hree moms from Montana will be at the Supreme Court Wednesday with a chance to make history on religious school choice”; “[w]hat they’re fighting over [in Espinoza v. [read post]
