Search for: "Robert F. Stephens" Results 81 - 100 of 707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2022, 2:28 pm by Steve Lubet
GershmanDistinguished Professor of LawElisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Charles Gardner GeyhDistinguished Professor and John F. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Will Baude
Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Robert P. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Nessim Mezrahi, Stephen Sigrist, and Carolina Doherty review the extent to which plaintiffs’ lawyers generally are relying on short-seller research to try to substantiate fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:24 pm by Shalini Bhargava Ray
§ 1252(f)(1), bars injunctive relief ordering the government to provide bond hearings to an entire class of noncitizens. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 6:26 am
Hill-Rom: New Lessons on Material Adverse Effect Clauses Posted by Robert T. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
They argue the FEC’s delay has potentially deprived the American public of information that was not revealed during Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion that was joined by the court’s three liberal justices – Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
On Nov. 9, a federal district judge rejected former President Trump’s request to enjoin the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) from releasing his presidential records to the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
District Judge Robert Pitman granted the administration’s request to put the law on hold. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The HawkTalk Blog has analysed the proposals in the DCMS consultation document, Data: a new direction, to change the “legitimate interests” in Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR so that the controller’s legitimate interests always prevails in a limited number of pre-defined circumstances. [read post]