Search for: "Robert R. Lord" Results 81 - 100 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2019, 2:57 pm by Katie Bart
Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., quoted Chief Justice John Roberts’ take: “’I think if there were cameras that the lawyers would act differently. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We are posting this call for papers from the website of the Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 12:52 am by Tessa Shepperson
A new Lord Chancellor Turning to the Justice Dept, I am pleased to hear that the new Lord Chancellor and Justice Minister is a lawyer – Robert Buckland QC. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
There are 3 opinions that concur in part and dissent in part, one by Roberts, one by Breyer, and one by Sotomayor. [read post]
22 May 2019, 11:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Finishing terms as directors for 2018-2020 are Greg Moore, of Norton Rose Fulbright; Robert Painter, of the Painter Law Firm; Greg Ulmer, of BakerHostetler; and Mitch Reed, of Hunton Andrews Kurth. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 6:57 am
"My best guess is that Robert Downey Junior, who riffs on the tough [sci]-fi actors of the 60s, and the other highly paid actors who portray silly superheroes, are to the 2010s what Dylan, who riffed on the tough Delta Basin singers of the 30s, was to the 1960s. [read post]
  Judge Cory’s recommendations led to public inquiries into the deaths of Rosemary Nelson, Billy Wright and Robert Hamill.) [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
This conclusion was criticised by Robert Wintemute amongst others, in particular in a case-note in the Industrial Law Journal in 2016 (‘Unequal Same-Sex Survivor’s Pensions: The EWCA Refuses to Apply CJEU Precedents or Refer’ (2016) 45(1) Ind Law J 89-100), and his criticisms were subsequently explicitly cited by Lord Kerr in giving the judgment of the majority of the Supreme Court reversing the decision of the lower court. [read post]