Search for: "Roberts v. Commonwealth"
Results 81 - 100
of 366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
” But precisely because racism now stands—or should stand—as a primary example of properly-repudiated bigotry, present-day rhetoric of bigotry is highly charged for it carries with it evocations of this repudiated past.In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
May 22) (Robert E. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
Bruce McClintock QC, told the federal court that it was “fundamental to his vindication” that Roberts-Smith be able to testify in open court after lawyers for the commonwealth produced documents which could have implications for the evidence presented in the trial. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:21 pm
In today's Roberts v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm
Roberts do not seek to insulate themselves from the Commonwealth's general public health guidelines. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
” At Reuters, Ted Hesson provides an explainer for Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:32 am
The case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
People, 1 Doug. 207 (Mich. 1843),” “Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
In addition to amounts otherwise made available, $100,000,000, to remain available through September 30, 2021, shall be available for the Secretary of Agriculture to provide grants to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and American Samoa for nutrition assistance in response to a COVID–19 public health emergency: Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the … [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:03 am
Aldoupolis, 390 Mass. 438, 439 (1983) (empaneling a criminal jury); Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 6 January 2020, Besanko J gave judgment in the case of Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications [2020] FCA 2 dismissing an application for disclosure of confidential sources. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Policy As part of our policy efforts (discussed in greater detail here) we have intervened jointly with the Federation of Law Societies of Canada before the Supreme Court in the Keatley v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
The hearing will feature testimony from Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Behler, the director of operational test and evaluation in the office of the secretary of defense; Lt. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
On July 29, 2019, Judge Robert A. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer, is the most straightforward, in that it relied principally on PG&E v. [read post]
