Search for: "Roberts v. Watts"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
Arbitrators generally permitted independent recourse to third-party sources when necessary to confirm technical informationMatter of Watt v Roberts, 2010 NY Slip Op 09171, decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentAn arbitration panel selected by the Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 and the New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority granted a 3% wage increase to employees of the… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Dowling v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
More background on the case can be found at the Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:36 am
(Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
In the Watts case, Robert Watts was convicted of violating § 871(a). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal has this article explaining Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
BOX 4 HWYS. 21 & 72 ARCADIA MO-Missouri 6 CULPEPPER'S ARNOLD 22 ARNOLD PARK MALL ARNOLD MO-Missouri 7 ROBERT'S SUPERMARKET 112 EAST BOONE P.O. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:24 pm
Graham; AmosGuiora; Samuel V. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
Watts & Amy J. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:25 pm
Professor Mank discusses the impact of the Court’s loosening of the standing requirements for states in the Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
As noted in prior posts here and here and here, the Sixth Circuit is currently considering en banc review of the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement after Booker in the wake of a panel's notable per curiam ruling in US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:04 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert Schutz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The majority simply relied on the Supreme Court opinion in Watts, which the Booker majority specifically found did not address the relevant constitutional issues, and the other Circuits' adherence to use of acquitted conduct to increase sentences. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 6:08 am
Conley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
But the buck has to stop someplace if there is to be accountability, and it is frankly better, in my view, for it stop with states in order to have a single, visible actor to hold accountable, whether legally or politically.[1] Sir Robert Jennings and Sir Arthur Watts, 1 Oppenheim's International Law 16 (9th ed., 1992).[2] See, [read post]
