Search for: "Robin v. Thomas" Results 81 - 100 of 297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 12:18 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Citibank Franchisor Isn’t Liable Under the TCPA for Franchisees’ Text Message Campaign – Thomas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Legal Studies Paper (2018)).Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Revisiting Abdul Kadir v Salima: Locus Classicus on Civil Nature of Marriage? [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
A number of important media law cases have been decided by the English courts in the past 12 months including Sir Cliff Richard OBE v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) this has perhaps been the most high profile and discussed case of the year and has been the subject of a wide range of Inforrm posts including by Robin Callender-Smith, Jonathan Coad, Paul Wragg, Brian Cathcart, Jelena Gligorijević and Thomas Bennett (Parts 1 and 2). [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
(Robin Barnes, in her book, Outrageous Invasions, gives some striking examples of US cases in which such a public interest has been asserted – including cases where the interactions of paramedics with dying patients have been broadcast – in the interests of dispelling the argument.) [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Patricia Londono on UKHRB, “Sir Cliff v BBC: A new era for police investigations? [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Robin Grieff and Hillary Rich preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Socially aware blog uses the recent case of Herrick v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
Robin Grieff and Hillary Rich provide a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
School Dist. v Thomas Assoc. (91 NY2d 256 [1998]) has nothing to do with a plaintiff’s ability to bring both claims simultaneously. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am by Ben
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:         Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In  concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities:  Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 10:22 am by Garrett Hinck
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Robin Simcox analyzed policy options for stopping terrorists from using cars and trucks to attack civilians. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:05 pm
A portion of the travel and accommodation expenses of selected participants will be covered by the conference.Scientific Committee:Lisa Herzog (Institut für Sozialforschung der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat)Claire Lemercier (Centre de Sociologie des Organisations de Sciences Po)Anne Peters (Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht)Emmanuelle Tourme-Jouannet (Ecole de droit de Sciences Po)Organisational Committee:Filipe Antunes… [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In MT Hojgaard AS v E.ON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd & Anor [2017] UKSC 59, the court held that the performance requirement took precedence and that the contractor was liable when the structure failed soon after erection although the structure was built according to the design standard which had an error in it. [read post]