Search for: "Robinson, Appeal of" Results 81 - 100 of 2,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Robinson Ford Sales, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Oct. 26, 2006), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) construed the CLRA's attorneys fees provision (Civ. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:38 am
”Although it did not affect its ultimate disposition, the appeal panel said Robinson should not have to prove that the residential school legacy affected him. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:47 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Robinson recently stayed, in the interest of judicial economy, its decision on the motion to amend judgment filed by defendant, pending the Federal Circuit's decision in Robert Bosch LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:28 pm by Robert Vrana
May 3, 2012), Judge Robinson detailed the  Courts of Appeal’s history of allowing “civil action[s] for patent infringement [to] be brought in the judicial district in which the defendant was incorporated. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Subsequently, the UT dismissed Mr Robinson’s application for judicial review of the decision that the further representations were not a fresh claim and the FTT’s decision that he had no right of appeal. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:50 am by Andrew Russell
Last week, Judge Robinson granted a motion to stay pending re-examination in Vehicle IP, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:48 am by Joseph Gribbin
Regarding the trademark infringement claims, Judge Robinson determined, based on the current record, the likelihood of confusion in the market by applying a multi-factor test previously adopted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (modified for cases involving a nominative fair use defense), finding that the balance of factors favored Sturm Foods. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm by Kate Forrest
In 2015, Officer Casey Benton conducted a traffic stop on a car in which Troy Robinson was a passenger. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:34 am
The plaintiff had appealed the not-guilty verdict on the grounds that the trial judge had erred in allowing jury instructions that included sole proximate cause language. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 11:57 am by James L. Higgins
’” Therefore, the Court (by way of clarification for appeal) confirmed that its earlier dismissal was with prejudice. [read post]