Search for: "Robinson v. Federal Express"
Results 81 - 100
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss Sveen at Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
” At The Federalist, Donald Daugherty reviews Kimberly Robinson’s new book, “American Justice 2017: The Supreme Court in Crisis,” concluding that “Robinson succeeds in turning a sleepy term into an interesting read, even without any real crisis. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
Tuesday was the first day of the Fish v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
” (Quoting Robinson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in on this again in R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:52 pm
Jacobson thus determined that federal agents’ warrantless examination of a package of cocaine discovered by Federal Express employees and their field testing of its contents was not a Fourth Amendment search. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s 1857 Dynes v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Valencia-Lucena, 925 F.2d 506, 512 (1st Cir. 1991))); Robinson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
See Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:35 am
The lower federal court denied Robinson’s claim that he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Robinson, 391 S.W.3d 590, 593-94 (Tex. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Robinson, 148 N.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Robinson, 148 N.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
If a North Carolina state or local law enforcement officer conducts a frisk affected by this ruling and a resulting federal prosecution (e.g., drug and firearm crimes) occurs in a North Carolina federal district court, the Robinson ruling will govern the officer’s conduct. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
If a North Carolina state or local law enforcement officer conducts a frisk affected by this ruling and a resulting federal prosecution (e.g., drug and firearm crimes) occurs in a North Carolina federal district court, the Robinson ruling will govern the officer’s conduct. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux looks at last Tuesday’s oral argument in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Hardee, 723 F.3d 488 (4th Cir. 2013) (summarizing, in a federal habeas case, that “expert testimony on eyewitness identifications is not automatically admitted; when allowed, its admissibility is generally at the court’s discretion, both under federal and North Carolina law”); State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Hardee, 723 F.3d 488 (4th Cir. 2013) (summarizing, in a federal habeas case, that “expert testimony on eyewitness identifications is not automatically admitted; when allowed, its admissibility is generally at the court’s discretion, both under federal and North Carolina law”); State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
