Search for: "Robinson v. Robinson" Results 81 - 100 of 3,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
White (2006), and the Court of Appeals (Chin, Carney and Robinson) applies that holding here. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court also provides interesting analysis on what constitutes an adverse action under Title VII.The case is Banks v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Again, we consider the whole picture in sizing up a case.While the district court said plaintiff suffered no tangible harm, the Court (Chin, Carney and Robinson) reminds us that no psychological harm is required under Harris v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Consequently, absences for ART treatment can still be dealt with in the same way as other forms of illness absence without being discriminatory (London Borough of Greenwich v Robinson (unreported; [1995] UKEAT 745)). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
The Robinson approach – derived from the judgment in R (Robinson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [1998] QB 929, under which permission to appeal to the UT should be granted on a ground that was not advanced by an applicant for permission only if the judge was satisfied that the ground identified had a strong prospect of success – in the jargon, “Robinson obvious” – applied only in favour of the individual… [read post]