Search for: "Rodgers v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
On this day in ...... 1893 (115 years ago today), in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
  The district court didn't let him, holding that the United States and California were already defendants and had more than adequate incentives to defend the relevant tax statutes. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm by Rosalind English
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 9:14 pm by Ben Allen
 § 851, however, continues, as shown in the Sixth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2010] EWHC 3376 – Read judgment The Guardian newspaper has failed to convince the High Court that it should be able to see  key documents in the trial of three men threatened with extradition to the United States on charges of corruption and bribery. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-820. [read post]
Bensaid v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 44599/98, Feb. 6, 2001). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]