Search for: "Rodriguez v. I. N. S" Results 81 - 100 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2007, 3:37 pm
" Erickson, slip op. at 9 n.2. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In another unanimous ruling, Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:57 am by Richard Hunt
Village Green Realty, Inc., 788 F.3d 31, 40 at n. 10 (2nd Cir. 2015) and see Logan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am by Jeff Welty
” That consideration is exactly what the Supreme Court focused on in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm by mjpetro
Discussion The Sixth Amendment provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
El proyecto, que además incluye la mención a la traición a la patria como el más grave delito, que merece la pena más severa, recupera la figura del primer ministro y define el matrimonio como la unión entre dos personas, sin especificar su sexo, lo que abriría la puertas a una eventual legalización del matrimonio homosexual. * * * El Gobierno ha puesto a la venta en papel el… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:38 pm
I.- Régimen normativo aplicable y planteamiento del problema La Ley 22/1994, de 6 de julio, de Responsabilidad por los Daños Causados por Productos Defectuosos incorporó la Directiva 85/374/CEE, de 25 de julio, relativa a la aproximación de las disposiciones legales, reglamentarias y administrativas de los Estados miembros en materia de responsabilidad por los… [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The arbitration agreement, which was negotiated by the parties and approved by the district court, required the court to “vacate, modify or correct any award: (i) where the arbitrator's findings of facts are not supported by substantial evidence, or (ii) where the arbitrator's conclusions of law are erroneous. [read post]