Search for: "Roe v. United States Department of Defense"
Results 81 - 93
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Their Declaration of Sentiments condemned a wide range of “injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman”—everything from withholding the right to vote, to applying different codes of moral conduct—and demanded “immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am
The twenty-week law was therefore unconstitutional under an unbroken stream of Supreme Court authority, beginning with Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
She escaped to the United States and sought asylum. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:12 pm
He was my Constitutional Law professor and was very clear about his support for Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:46 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932), the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
JAG HUNTER here: (posting from the Sweetwater, Tennessee Library) STEELE'S MARCH (PART III)(PART I) - (PART II) - (PART IV) - (PART V with related links)This narrative is intended to explain how and why senior commanders forced-marched Michael Steele into exile, and Steel's innocent subordinates into Defense Department catacombs. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
The 2007 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
