Search for: "Rojas v. Rojas"
Results 81 - 100
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2009, 11:00 pm
(…) Resulta indiscutible la ausencia de carácter de agente de la autoridad del empleado denunciante de la empresa adjudicataria del Servicio de Estacionamiento Regulador de Vehículos en la Vía Pública (ORA), pues aquél sólo lo ostentan los miembros de la Policía Local y por tanto, no gozan las denuncias de aquellos de la presunción de veracidad que para los agentes de autoridad otorga el art. art. 76 del RDLeg. 339/1990 de 2… [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Cavazos, (9th Cir., March 20, 2015), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim because he failed to allege facts showing that the confiscation of his television substantially burdened the practice of his religion.In Rojas v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:14 pm
AndreToday, in Alcazar, et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Supreme Court today denied review in City of Ocala, Florida v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:06 am
Tavarez-Rojas, 2008 U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Valdez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:16 am
There is a panel discussion coming up on January 23, 2013, in honor of the fortieth anniversary of the ruling in Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm
Strangely, the U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
Rojas [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:57 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 am
Descarga el documento: Soto-Cintrón et al v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 pm
AndreAs we previously reported here, in Alcazar, et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:15 pm
and the third one, Rojas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:50 am
charnsitr / Shutterstock.com Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Sincerely, Montez V. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:44 pm
Estas leyes incluyen el detenerse en las señales de PARE y en las luces rojas, correr con el flujo del tránsito, el uso de luces por la noche y ceder el derecho de paso al entrar a una carretera. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:54 pm
" (Rojas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
