Search for: "Roll v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
In fact, plaintiffs allege that Montana has warmed more than most of the contiguous United States because northern latitudes heat more quickly. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
  The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm by Larry
 If you are bothering to read this blog, you likely know that most goods entering the United States are appraised on the basis of transaction value, whch is the total price paid or payable for the merchandise when sold for export to the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 1:48 pm by Steven Gallagher
Dolgen California, LLC, rejected the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises that instructed courts to dismiss representative PAGA claims when individual PAGA claims were compelled to arbitration. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
Villalba has been in the United States for 30 years -- since he came here from Mexico when he was 13 years old -- and has a wife and six kids here (two of his, three of hers, and one of theirs). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:21 am by Ben Sperry
There are no laws against false speech in general, nor can there be, since the Supreme Court declared such speech was protected in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Those harms to which the state plaintiffs pointed in Dep't of Commerce--"diminishment of political representation, loss of federal funds, degradation of census data, and diversion of resources" away from Democratic-leaning political units and towards Republican-leaning ones--were the reason for the citizenship question. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:53 pm by Suhre & Associates
Sitz In 1990, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Michigan v. [read post]