Search for: "Romano v. US" Results 81 - 100 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
While legal scholars have long recognized that shadow trading can be profitable, SEC v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:58 am by Daniel McCarthy
The large majority of courts addressing the issue will permit discovery of social media content upon a threshold showing that the information sought has some relevance to the underlying lawsuit: Romano v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:49 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Prominent GIs encompass well-known examples such as Champagne and Bordeaux concerning wines, and Grana Padano and Pecorino Romano concerning cheeses. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
Our friend José Calvo González of the University of Malaga Faculty of Law tells us of the publication ofDerecho y Literatura Hispánica, a special issue of the journal Studi ispanici  for 2014. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
There is a new book out called America the Philosophical by Carlin Romano. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by C. Todd Smith
Because of this possibility, we urge our clients to check the privacy settings for their profiles to make sure that only friends can see what is posted, especially photographs (In the New York case of Romano v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP)… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As far as securities and the economy in general are concerned, once Wickard v. [read post]