Search for: "Ron Coleman"
Results 81 - 100
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 6:06 am
", Ron Coleman's Likelihood of Confusion post on, well, likelihood of confusion --one of the most thought-provoking items this Kat has seen on the subject in more than a little while. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:19 am
One of those jarring moments was when Circuit Judge Kimberly Ann Moore, the initial Tam panelist who appeared to spearhead the sua sponte Constitutional review en banc, consistent with her “additional views” appended to the original panel affirmance, asked our friend Ron Coleman (counsel for Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
Shutterstock / Apolinarias: Dance class blue seamless pattern. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am
#copyright https://t.co/PeNgW4yYXD — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) September 16, 2015 It is huge. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:03 am
Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), and Joni Ernst (R-IA); along with U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
All is proceeding as I have foreseen: http://t.co/NMS2CBQjdO https://t.co/Mgi79j8ieP — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) September 10, 2015 [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:54 am
That's given me the invaluable opportunity of working with the redoubtable Ron Coleman as co-counsel both in the district court and the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:17 am
Some have helped already, putting in long pro bono hours to fight Kimberlin — especially Ron Coleman of Archer & Greiner PC and Bruce Godfrey of Jezic & Moyse LLC. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:58 am
” And another hat tip, to our friend Ron Coleman over at his Likelihood of Confusion blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:50 am
https://t.co/xN3bRHWVhP — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) May 4, 2015 And what a room! [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm
Long-time readers may recall that, together with Ron Coleman, I'm pro bono counsel to Patrick Frey, who blogs as Patterico. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:08 am
" Ron Coleman has this post today at his "Likelihood of Confusion" blog providing access to the brief he filed yesterday on rehearing en banc in the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:41 am
In his inimitable style. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE: DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:16 am
Another might be Ron Coleman’s upcoming in banc oral argument at the Federal Circuit in The Slants case, to address the court’s sua sponte questions about whether the disparagement prong of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act violates Free Speech. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:35 pm
And at his "Likelihood of Confusion" blog, Ron Coleman (counsel for appellant in the case) has a post titled "Federal Circuit on the THE SLANTS: Shut up about the constitution already. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:24 pm
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) March 30, 2015 [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:45 am
In an intriguing afternoon session, friends and fellow bloggers Ron Coleman and Steve Baird, along with Jesse Witten and the USPTO's Cynthia Lynch, will focus on "an overview of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act as well as the procedures for determining if a trademark is disparaging. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:04 am
I’m looking forward to hearing Ron Coleman’s perspective on Section 2(a), as counsel for The Slants, a case currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Jesse Witten, as counsel for Amanda Blackhorse and other Native American petitioners who prevailed against the Washington R*dskins last June. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:32 am
In an intriguing afternoon session, fellow blogger Ron Coleman, my friend Steve Baird, Jesse Witten, and the USPTO's Cynthia Lynch will focus on "an overview of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act as well as the procedures for determining if a trademark is disparaging. [read post]
