Search for: "Rose v. Locke"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:32 pm
" Molloy referenced the 9th Circuit case, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:39 pm
Apparently the contracts locked in the prices NGD could charge for future deliveries of gas -- which price commitment proved a bad bet when spot gas prices rose. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
" Rose v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:47 pm
The case is University of Louisville v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:14 am
NicSand Inc. v. 3M Co., No. 05-3431 (6th Cir. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
V&E Raises Associate Salaries in Texas and D.C. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 1:07 pm
.'" Casse v. [read post]
