Search for: "Roth v. May" Results 81 - 100 of 413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2007, 10:22 am
Roth Associates, Inc. and Mary Roth (NFP) - "The trial court found that "Plaintiff admit[ted] that there was no written partnership agreement. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:01 am by Broc Romanek
Resource Extraction: SEC Proposes to Adopt Rules Within 270 Days As we blogged about a few weeks ago, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts – in Oxfam America v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Content-neutral requirements for demonstrations on public streets at parks, with insurance aimed at dealing with potential harms unrelated to content (e.g., physical injury and property damage), may be constitutional. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am by INFORRM
Previous decisions have acknowledged the verification function that accompanying photographs might provide to a story (Rothe v Austria, Von Hannover (No 2)). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
 These summaries are based on the issues listed in the briefs filed and may not very accurately or fully describe the actual issues in the cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Roth[Affirmed/vacated; Stegall; May 10, 2019]Improper imposition of lifetime postrelease supervisionDissatisfaction with counsel required withdrawal of pleaState v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:51 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Roth[Dismissal affirmed; Rosen; June 19, 2020]Is sentence appeal moot after completion of sentence? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 3:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the holding of a judge in the Southern District of New York that a director by deputization, including one that also is a ten percent owner, may rely on Rule 16b-3 to exempt its transactions with the issuer in Roth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank & Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 595; Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913; Aranki v Goldman & Assoc., LLP, 34 AD3d at 511-512; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909, 910-911). [read post]