Search for: "Rounds v. Clements"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
” At the Opinionator Blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Simmons v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
At Slate’s Breakfast Table, Paul Clement notes that the ruling in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” As part of the same discussion, Paul Clement debates whether the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
(At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
A couple of people e-mailed me this story, which is apparently making the rounds in some conservative circles. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:04 am
Quon; Robertson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:26 am
Times discusses City of Ontario v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
The WSJ Law Blog commented on the "rematch of Paul Clement and Neal Katyal," who last argued against one another in 2006 in Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Former Solicitor General Paul Clement marked his fiftieth argument before the Supreme Court with Perdue v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:44 am
The one most recently resolved by the Court was Financial Industries Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:03 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Supreme Court to rounds of a boxing bout, might as well extend the sports metaphor long enough to score yesterday's 3d round, recorded in this transcript and this audio. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:02 pm
In Rasul v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Currently, a team must forfeit two first-round draft picks in exchange for the franchise player. [30] This price is so steep, it virtually guarantees no owner will decide to utilize this course of action. [31] Rather than two first round draft picks as compensation for losing the franchised player, the cost could be reduced to perhaps a second-round and fourth-round pick, or two second-round picks. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 9:32 am
Gates (06-1197) and Parhat v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:25 am
A flurry of stories and commentary followed the news yesterday that Solicitor General Paul Clement did indeed file a brief in support of the businesses in the upcoming Stoneridge v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 8:12 am
The case is Munaf v. [read post]
