Search for: "Rowles v. Rowles" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 12:51 am
In its decision the BVerfG stressed that (like all other cases) cases relating to under-age celebrities required a case-by-case balancing of the conflicting rights (freedom of expression v personality right). [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
The Supreme Court treated the issue less than transparently in Campbell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
This wasn't even a difficult case: the events took place in private behind closed and locked doors, not in the more contested world of the outdoors (cf Rowling (Murray v Big Picture)); the case wasn't contaminated as in Douglas by the existence of a threatened connected revenue stream. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
The Daily Mail has printed an apology to the author JK Rowling in which it states that it has paid her substantial damages over an article that claimed she had told a misleading “sob story. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Rowling, who argued that the law undermines free expression and freedom of belief. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:51 am by INFORRM
The recent libel judgment handed down in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) has made headlines around the world and has captured the attention of the public. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
Rowling, Beyoncé, the late Mother Teresa, and the late astronaut Sally Ride. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm by INFORRM
Rowling’s son, being published along a street in a stroller, had a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm by Steve McConnell
That's hardly the stuff of Tolkien, Larsson, or Rowling. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Commonwealth Insurance Company, (1990) 48 B.C.L.R. 2d 305 at pages 309 - 311, and cited by Rowles J.A. in  Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
And earlier this year, in the similarly no-chance Doe v. [read post]