Search for: "Rowles v. Rowles" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by INFORRM
These include the limitation of the obligation to publications that would involve the revelation of plainly intimate or sensitive facts (so, not for example in the JK Rowling case) [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Thanks to the Engelberg Center at NYU for making this meeting possible, and Pam Samuelson for hosting! [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm by Howard Knopf
Rowling herself on the one hand and big corporate publishers on the other? [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
As reported by The Times, Rowling’s lawyer stated that the settlement “purport[s] to change US and international copyright rules. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
Rowling would probably point out, this kind of thing just isn't a job for muggles). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The story of Warner Bros v RDR Books - the Harry Potter Lexicon case - provides a vehicle to examine the conundrum. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:40 am
I am sorry to say that I was not surprised when I read this article in Inside Higher Ed last week about “Pirates v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:52 am
These include  Douglas v Hello (Catherine Zeta-Douglas and Michael Douglas wedding photos),  Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers (photos of Naomi Campbell leaving a clinic), or indeed the JK Rowling decision (JK Rowling's son entitlement to rivacy). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Commonwealth Insurance Company, (1990) 48 B.C.L.R. 2d 305 at pages 309 - 311, and cited by Rowles J.A. in  Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:22 pm
The British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld provisions of federal pension plans providing reduced death benefits payable on the death of older members of the plans.In a decision released yesterday, Withler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]