Search for: "Ruby v. U.s" Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2011, 7:24 am by Lovechilde
  Or if this were V-J day and a sailor’s kiss said it all. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The same can apply for color trade marks and trade dress in the U.S. as long as the color has acquired a "secondary meaning" and is non-functional, i.e. the color does not function except as an indication as to source (Qualitex v Jacobson) Ask any shopper on Fifth Avenue and the AmeriKat thinks one could quickly come to the conclusion that the primary function of the red-sole is that of indicating the source of the shoe as being Louboutin - that or signalling to the poor… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
In a particularly egregious case, the administration rearranged the line of succession in the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
[Boston, Mass] : Aspatore Books, c2010.ImmigrationKF4819.85 .B73 2010Fiancé and marriage visas : a couple's guide to U.S. immigration / Ilona M. [read post]