Search for: "Ruiz v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:18 am
In Ovalle v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:08 am
Ruiz, the court based its decision on a 2009 United States Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 5:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
“I think that that’s unknowable,” Trivett says in reference to whether Baluchi will actually be housed at Camp VII, though Judge Pohl counters that it would be highly likely, especially given the travel ban for detainees to the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 755–802 (1993); Larry Catá Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, 6 S. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:08 am
Ruiz always firmly wished for KMRC to return to live in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Edward Ryan, an attorney for the United States, then informs Judge Pohl that he is prepared to respond, but asks for a moment with the Chief Prosecutor and co-trial counselor. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Both “are Mexican corporations, are not registered in Texas or any of the United States, and do not have any offices, employees, agents, or representatives in Texas. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
To retroactivity and fair notice broadly, the brief argues, “no accused could have had notice that the laws of war applied in Yemen in 2000”—and in fact, “the President and Congress’s pronouncements that the United States was not at war in Yemen provided notice that the laws of w [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:30 am
Three years later, when facing removal from the United States, ... [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 8:28 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
