Search for: "Russell v. District of Columbia"
Results 81 - 100
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
It has been over three decades since Fuller was robbed, viciously beaten and sodomized in the District of Columbia’s H Street NE neighborhood. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:15 am
District of Columbia.) [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(d)). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
A new lawsuit filed in federal district court in the District of Columbia on behalf of five transgender servicemembers challenges President Trump’s apparent reversal of the military’s transgender service policy. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Enviratrands, Inc. and Russell F. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
“Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, all would have their statutes declared unconstitutional at once. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
The jinx struck again in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:46 am
Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Maddox, 11-670, in which the District of Columbia’s response is due January 30; Byrne alleges a split with the D.C. [read post]
