Search for: "Russell v. Fox"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
It nevertheless seems likely that, in the light of proposed takeover of Fox by Disney that Fox will then be able to acquire 100% of Sky. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
In an op-ed for the ACSblog, Lawrence Fox argues that in McCoy, which the court will consider tomorrow, “[t]he Supreme Court should reverse, ensuring Mr. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
Mr Gayle and his teammate Dwayne Smith gave evidence as did Ms Russell. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
At the same time Ofcom published its “fit and proper” assessment [pdf], concluding that “the behaviours alleged at Fox News amount to significant corporate failure, however the overall evidence available to date does not provide a reasonable basis to conclude that if Sky were 100% owned and controlled by Fox, it would not be fit and proper to hold broadcast licences”. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
An anti-Trump protestor has filed a defamation claim against Fox News alleging that the channel falsely linked him to voter fraud. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Kenneth Anderson flagged Professor Richard Armitage’s topic for this year’s 19th Annual Grotius Lecture at the ASIL Annual Meeting, and he also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
That a witness has been qualified as an expert does not change this Fox v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm
In Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:13 pm
In Zubik v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
Designer Guild Limited design Russell Williams Limited design Similarly, the VHS tape, “Welfare Aspects of Shooting Foxes”, attached to the Scottish case of Whaley and another (Appellant) v Lord Advocate (Respondent), [2007] UKHL 53 will remain as a supplement to the microfilm. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court Furman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
Fox v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Russell. 1998. [read post]
