Search for: "S. B.1" Results 81 - 100 of 64,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2020, 7:00 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
As noted in yesterday's post, Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) has been amended as of December 1, 2020. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 3:03 pm by Gregory J. Brodzik
Stark issued decisions with respect to defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims of willful patent infringement pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 41(a)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm
The July 31, 2022 deadline is rapidly approaching for employers to update the Forms I-9 of employees who presented an expired List B document (establishing the individual’s identity) between May 1, 2020 and April 30, 2022. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:19 pm
Child support in New York is calculated pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act ("CSSA") (Domestic Relations Law §240(1-b) and Family Court Act § 413(1)(b)). [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 8:49 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides an exclusion to the rule against hearsay for a statement that (B) is consistent with the declarant’s testimony and is offered: (i) to rebut an express or implied charge that the declarant recently fabricated... [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:06 am
§ § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 846.HELD: District court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for new trial where defendant claimed post-trial diagnosis of adult diabetes with accompanying pain, nausea, and delusional state was newly discovered evidence showing that he was incompetent to stand trial. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:00 am by Seth Leventhal
Let’s say three “innocent” lenders, A, B, and C, lent a scammer $100,00, $200,00, and $500,000, at Date 1(A), Date 2(B), and Date 3(C), at 10%(A), 22%(B), and 1,600%(C). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm by Jeremy Saland
While these words may not have violated PL 240.30(1)(b), the defendant did run afoul of Second Degree Aggravated Harassment. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm by Jeremy Saland
While these words may not have violated PL 240.30(1)(b), the defendant did run afoul of Second Degree Aggravated Harassment. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:54 am by Tracy Thomas
Anita Bernstein (Brooklyn), The Feminist Jurisprudence of Jack B. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am by Mayela Celis
I would like to touch upon three topics in this post: 1) the examples of assertions that can be raised under Article 13(1)(b) and their categorisation; 2) measures of protection and 3) domestic violence. 1) One of the great accomplishments of the Guide to Good Practice is the categorisation of the examples of assertions that can be raised under Article 13(1)(b) of the Child Abduction Convention. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B).HELD:(1) Drug dog's failure to fully alert during sniff-test of defendant's boots does not negate probable cause when other circumstances support such finding. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:10 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), Alaska Rule of Evidence 404(b)(1) provides that Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible if the sole purpose for offering the evidence is to prove the character of a person... [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:50 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) reads as follows: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  How could it possibly be correct to say there were no final determinations adverse to B&Bs ownership of a valid mark? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Barrett, 280 Va. 627 (2010), the Virginia Supreme Court vindicated Plaintiff’s right to reinstate her wrongful death suit within 1 year of its dismissal under Va. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:43 am by Roy F Harmon III
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the district court’s decision rejecting Plaintiffs’ claims under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. [read post]