Search for: "S. R. V. v. J. S. B."
Results 81 - 100
of 4,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
All allocation policies are unequal and as observed by Garnham J in R v XC Southwark (2017) EWHC 736 (Admin): “Every tweak to the scheme to benefit one individual or one class of applicant is likely to have an adverse effect on another…”. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
Ese desastre actual se debe no a las medidas discriminatorias aplicadas por gobiernos extranjeros —como mentirosamente quiere hacer creer la propaganda tendenciosa del régimen castrista—, sino por la total inoperancia del socialismo dirigista y burocrático que los comunistas cubanos implantaron y se empeñan en mantener a sangre y fuego. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Manuel J. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Forest Serv., 803 F.3d 809, 815–17 (6th Cir. 2015) (Sutton, J.) [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
Notably, the number of non-O157 STEC cases reported to CDC’s FoodNet has risen steadily each year; from 2000-2006, there was an overall 4-fold increase in incidence (0.12 cases per 100,000 to 0.42 cases per 100,000 population) at FoodNet sites. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The document demonstrates China’s sense of responsibility as a major country and constructive role in international affairs. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Kim, Tanya R. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” Jefferson County v Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 447 (1999) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
Alaska R. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
"We will remand the record to the Immigration Judge to determine if the respondent is credible, consistent with the First Circuit’s remand order [ Reyes v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
When considering question (iii), the Court of Appeal disagreed with Jay J’s earlier decision that Mrs Potter could not rely on s 32(1)(b) and instead found that: “the obligations to act fairly imposed on Canada Square by section 140A were sufficient to mean that their failure to disclose the commission amounted to a concealment of that commission within the meaning of section 32(1)(b)”. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
See 1 Wayne R. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
b. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
R. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Fuerst and Robert J. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
It’s long past time to stop relegating the climate problem to a narrowly conceived field of “environmental law. [read post]
