Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 81 - 100
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
Although some of you thought that the trivia question below about D. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:23 pm
In this case, D is for decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Regina v Horncastle and anotherl; ReginaMarquis and another [2009] UKSC 14; [2009] WLR (D) 358 "Provided the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 were observed, a defendant’s right to a fair trial, guaranteed art 6(3)(d) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, [...] [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 5:42 am
In Beyond Nuclear, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 8:31 pm
Related StoriesTop Stories of 2023: #5 to #7American Axle's Claims Found Eligible on RemandUnited Therapeutics Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:32 pm
Per U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
Supp. 2d ----, 2007 WL 867986 (D. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:54 am
McDougal Littell, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 660070 (D. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
Kovach v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
The D. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:48 am
Airtran Airways, 531 F.Supp.2d 660 (D. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:23 am
Per Jordan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:25 am
Regina (GC) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Regina (C) v Same [2010] WLR (D) 193 “When it was not possible to reconcile a decision of the House of Lords in relation to the proportionality and legitimacy of the indefinite retention on the United Kingdom’s Police National Computer of biometric data obtained in the course of criminal investigations with a subsequent holding by the European Court of Human Rights that the policy was unlawful,… [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:31 am
I'd like to post more later on the Supreme Court's recent cert grant yesterday in Salazar v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:20 am
FRIEDMAN, LARRY S. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Conley, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:35 am
Worker’s compensation — Course of employment — Going and coming rule The question presented by this appeal is whether appellant, Lisa Bolognino, is entitled to receive workers’ compensation benefits for injuries she suffered, from a slip-and-fall, that occurred shortly after she left an off-site holiday party held by her employer, appellee, Lemek, LLC, d/b/a Panera ... [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:24 pm
(Captain D's didn't fire the cook, Garious Harris. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:09 am
Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and another [2008] EWHC 1688 (QB); [2008] WLR (D) 247 “The restriction imposed by s 89(1) of the Housing Act 1980 on postponing enforcement of a possession order only applied to the court which made the order and not to a court exercising appellate jurisdiction in respect of the order. [read post]
