Search for: "SECURITIES ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
 The Hunton & Williams Privacy and Information Security Law Blog commented on the issue here. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
He noted that the prosecution accepted Mr Stenson’s case that he did not know phone hacking was against the law. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  SSRN There are case notes on three recent cases: Cartus Corporation v Siddell [2014] EWHC 2266 (QB) – from One Brick Court. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
  The drafter of PLAC’s brief in that case (Mayer Brown’s Ken Geller) sits with Bexis on PLAC's nationwide case selection committee, and outranks Bexis in seniority). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No. 7, No. 06-CV-2248 (D. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
(I’ll turn to the corporation question in the next post.) [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
 At page 26 of the opinion the Court notes that punitive damages are an accepted equitable remedy, citing  Nebesho v. [read post]