Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
North Carolina 14-593Issue: Whether the state of North Carolina performs an unconstitutional search when it requires a citizen to wear a GPS monitoring ankle bracelet for the rest of his life based only on the citizen's status as a recidivist sex offender and where there is no finding that he is a threat to society. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
You all know that: [u]nder the North Carolina Limited Liability Company Act, N.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:43 am
Michelle V. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
“Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
Beverage Systems of the Carolinas, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Or take North Carolina, for example, the homeland for Homeland. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:57 am
In North Carolina, shareholders can sue on behalf of corporations, but only under certain conditions. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:57 am
In North Carolina, shareholders can sue on behalf of corporations, but only under certain conditions. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:57 am
In North Carolina, shareholders can sue on behalf of corporations, but only under certain conditions. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:17 pm
When I last wrote about SCI North Carolina Funeral Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:04 pm
There is little case law under the North Carolina Securities Act. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
” Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability) §9 (1998); accord id. at comment a (§9 “appl[ies] to commercial product sellers”). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
App. 1991) (“[a] hospital that utilizes an alleged defective product only in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action of strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product”); North Miami General Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Both the money and the land in such a transaction are consideration; neither is more important to the public, although at the time of the transaction the money is more important to the seller and the land is more important to the buyer. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 4:29 am
The fungal meningitis outbreak discovered in Nashville and now spread to other states (Minnesota, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Indiana, Michigan, Virginia and Maryland) will shed new light on compounding pharmacies and epidural steroid injections. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
North Carolina would not apply the factors enunciated in U.S. [read post]
