Search for: "SHIELDS v. SMITH" Results 81 - 100 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Norman L. Eisen
” – Judge Tanya Chutkan Therefore, Smith proposed filing an opening brief explaining why the government believes the immunity established in Trump v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 goes hand in hand with the Directive’s liability shields under which conduits, hosts and network caches have various degrees of protection from criminal and civil liability for the activities of their users. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
This was specifically recognised in Recitals (9) and (46) of the Electronic Commerce Directive, which provided liability shields for conduits, caches and hosts. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 9:25 am
Lesslie, 939 P.2d at 446 (defendant had expectation of privacy within restroom because it was legitimate to assume conversation was shielded from the public). [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:04 pm by David Aronberg
For instance, if millionaire John Smith opens a pizza shop, and creates Smith’s Pizza Inc. to conduct the pizza business, John Smith himself is generally shielded from liability from incidents having to do with the pizza business. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law provides absolute immunity from liability for defamation based on oral or written statements made by attorneys in connection with a proceeding before a court “ ’when such words and writings are material and pertinent to the questions involved’ ” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015], quoting Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; see Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2016]; see also… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law provides absolute immunity from liability for defamation based on oral or written statements made by attorneys in connection with a proceeding before a court “ ’when such words and writings are material and pertinent to the questions involved’ ” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015], quoting Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; see Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2016]; see also… [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:16 am
No steps were taken to shield the area from observation and, in fact, the Nissan was visible from the road. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am by Shane Peagler
Scott Smith (Ph.D. in Educational Psychology) to the Georgia Supreme Court in Maynard v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.April 9, 2013 - 10 AM: Intellect Technical Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
It struck down the so-called “EU/US Privacy Shield”. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]