Search for: "SIERRA CLUB V DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The plaintiffs and appellants wereSavePanocheValley, Santa Clara Audubon Society and the Sierra Club. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
(See, e.g., Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:00 am
(Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Numerous “issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under [CEQA]” were presented for review and may be decided in Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court, in Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
It reasoned that the County’s incorporation by reference of the Department of Water Resources’ “minimum standards of well construction” intended to protect water quality, coupled with language in the local ordinance stating that well permits “shall be issued” if state and County standards are met, precluded the kind of discretion necessary to require compliance with CEQA. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
CEQA actions were filed by KG Farms, and by a number of citizens and environmental groups (including the Sierra Club), and these and another non-CEQA action were consolidated for trial and disposition. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
**Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am
For example, Justice Franson’s concurrence appears to aimed directly at the California Supreme Court in connection with its consideration of another Fifth District CEQA decision addressing the adequacy of an EIR’s air quality analysis (and specifically its “correlation” of pollutant emissions to adverse known health effects), Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Session I—Self-Regulation: Labor and Environmental Standards in Global Supply Chains.Richard B. [read post]
