Search for: "SMITH v. HEAD"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2023, 5:08 am
Clifford Smith SC of Des Voeux Chambers, Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm
From Osowski v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am
But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Gravel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
The epidemiology chapter mentions Rule 703 only in a footnote.[1] Rule 703 appears to be the red-headed stepchild of the Federal Rules, and it is often ignored and omitted from so-called Daubert briefs.[2] Perhaps part of the problem is that Rule 703 (“Bases of an Expert”) is one of the mostly poorly drafted rules in the Federal Rules of Evidence: “An expert may base an opinion on facts or data in the case that the expert has been made aware of or personally observed. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
If you need to know what the relevant arguments are from each side in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:05 am
[District court's opinion in Gruber v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
The panel was headed by Chief Judge William H. [read post]
