Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 81 - 100
of 2,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
By: Mark Casciari Seyfarth Synopsis: On March 20, 2019, in Frank, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
Co., et al., No. 09-C-562 (E.D.Wis. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:29 am
State of Connecticut et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
California State Lands Commission, et al (San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC, et al) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 5450294. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
In Robinson et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
Bay Mills Indian Community et al., Case No. 12-515 (May 27, 2014). [2] See Slip op. at 4-6. [3] Id. at 5, 7. [4] Defined in IGRA at 25 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 2:58 am
Co., et al., 06 Civ. 4023 (S.D.N.Y., June 29, 2007), the Southern District of New York examined whether a beneficiary of surety bonds had standing to bring a cause of action for bond payments against the reinsurer of a bond issuer. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:08 pm
The case is Santa Ana Police Officers Association et al., v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:05 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., et al., No. 15-16173, 2017 WL 4700093 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Carroll Robinson, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
DTJ Enterprises, Inc., et al., 2013-1405. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
District Court's Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order in Emmanuel Temple, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:13 pm
Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com et al., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm
The Creig Northrop Team et al that although the plaintiffs had alleged a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), they lacked standing under Article III of the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
State National Bank of Big Spring, et al., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
Summary of presentation: On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in American Electric Power, et al v Connecticut, et al (10-174) ("AEP"), a case filed by eight states, one city and three land trusts seeking an order requiring five of the nation's largest coal-fired power producers to reduce their emissions for at least a decade. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:05 pm
On March 21, 2017, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a Memorandum and Order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint in Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decided the case of Californians for Renewable Energy, et al., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:56 am
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. et al. v. [read post]
