Search for: "STANFORD v. STANFORD"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
“I note that memorial drapery has been placed on the door of our courtroom to signify mourning for” O’Connor, the chief justice told a packed courtroom present for oral arguments in the bankruptcy case Harrington v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Stanford Law Professor Pam KarlanPamela S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Most notably, O'Connor wrote the Court's majority opinion in New York v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:52 am
The legacy of Justice O’Connor was a powerful force for students involved in the Stanford Law Review when I was a member. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Encountering barriers as a young female lawyer In September 1946, then 16-year-old Sandra Day enrolled at Stanford. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Or so the SG argues.Lawyers for Jackson (including the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic) say the key date is when the defendant committed the federal offense. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Grigson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Though later disparaged in the era of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
Philanthropic Investment in People Power (Frank Farrow, Hanh Cao Yu & Robert Ross, Stanford Social Innovation Review) Organizing for the Long Haul by Building Community (Maurice Mitchell, Nonprofit Quarterly) Letting Lived Experience Lead the Way (Eddy Zheng, Center for Effective Philanthropy) Effective Audit Committee Guide (BDO USA) Never ask job candidates to do unpaid assignments as part of your hiring process (Vu Le, Nonprofit AF) Significant Events: … [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Johnson Fellow:“A Legal Form of Marriage”: The Legality of Queer Families in the United States, 1830-1920 Anin Luo, Princeton University Empathizing beyond Humanity: The 1970s Emergence of Personhood for Animals and the Environment Robyn Morse, University of Virginia, John Wertheimer/Davidson College Fellow: Enterprising Value: Labor Transitions and Legal Maneuvers During the Rise of the Oil Economy in Bahrain Wallace Teska, Stanford University, William… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same days, there was a hearing in the case of Hemming v Poulton. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
[What Swift v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Shill (University of Iowa), on Monday, October 16, 2023 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
