Search for: "STATE CLASSIFICATION OFFICE" Results 81 - 100 of 4,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
Commercial entities are advised to refer to the Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (OFAC) guidance on the OPC issued and revised on February 3 and December 20, 2023, respectively. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:01 am by Nicole Pottroff
The RFQ specifically stated: “[i]f no qualified SDVOSB offers are received, it is possible other small businesses can be considered. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:48 pm by JP Sarmiento
  Based on our client’s working backgrounds, our office determined that he is eligible for EB-3 classification for his I-140 petition. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm by Sean Kirby and Joseph Peacock
 Additionally, while the DOL’s final rule constitutes a significant shift in the classification analysis under the FLSA, this rule does not affect state employee classification standards, such as the ABC test under California law. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:31 am by Gordon Firemark
Unfortunately, due to this incomplete filing, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has received another application for the same trademark and name. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  Millennium’s vice chairman and chief legal officer also happens to be a former general counsel of the SEC. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:13 am by Berry Law
However, there is a classification called Presumptive Disability Benefits. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:11 am by admin
Learn more about sex offender registration laws in Denver at the Law Office Of Richard B. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:11 am by Andrew Weissmann
The cover of one binder was marked unclassified, the other had no classification marking, and we cannot show that Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The WHD says it’s investigation of Sails Restaurant LLC (Sails) found multiple violations of requirements of the H-2B worker visa program including: Misrepresenting job requirements despite having previously used and knowing the requirements by willfully misrepresenting access to high-paid server positions with unlimited earnings potential when instead no such job existed; promotional positions out of reach for many; and shifting a dining room attendant to another job as a construction… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  This does not include charges filed with state or local Fair Employment Practices Agencies. [read post]
” The Swedish prosecutorial office stated that they changed the criminal classification due to the nature of the “grossly illegal threat” and “attempts to cause public destruction. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Those holdings may have had support in 1923, but it is now 2024 where "state classifications based on alienage are subject to 'strict judicial scrutiny,'" absent the governmental function exception, Ambach v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:41 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Read the full story here USPTO to open offices in Atlanta and New Hampshire On 13 December 2023, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a press release announcing that it will open a new regional office in Atlanta, Georgia and a new community outreach office in Strafford County, New Hampshire. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
” In addition to claiming national origin discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the lawsuit asserts that the new law, known as H.E.A. 1050, is a state-created immigration classification, and thus preempted by federal law. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Anne Perry and Lillia Damalouji
Since our last Bid Protest Hub article in November, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) has published 37 bid protest decisions, two of which have resulted in decisions sustaining the protester’s challenge. [read post]
 The plaintiffs argued that because IARC’s classification of glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic” was disputed by a number of international regulatory authorities and organizations, the state could not could not compel businesses to provide warnings stating that glyphosate is “known” to cause cancer. [read post]