Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF I. C. Vs."
Results 81 - 100
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2009, 2:49 pm
Laase made the required showing, I would hold that his interest in the vehicle is not subject to forfeiture. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm
ANALYSIS I. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
The judges held that the claimant’s and defendant’s goods (bilingual dictionaries vs. language learning software) were very similar: stating that a dictionary was a “helpful and indispensable aid” when learning a language. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, the Nixon Administration jump-started the current exemptions regime by incentivizing the states to create medical neglect exemptions for parents who treat sick children solely with prayer as a pre-condition for federal Medicare funding, as I discuss in chapter 2 of God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:48 pm
ANALYSIS: i. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:23 pm
And why don’t I close now on that relatively optimistic note. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
F.T. vs. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
Shearer v Rich Reister, and – after a trip to the court of appeals - Reister v Dallas County District Attorney, while Reynolds stands for State of Texas vs. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:23 am
” The question in the case is, rather, “how does what the state did here relate to (a) the authority of parents over their children, (b) the power of the state to protect the well-being of children, and (c) the constitutional protection for ‘the freedom of speech’? [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” 750 ILCS 5/602.7(c) The allocation of parenting time is broad and generous to both parents. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
He is, in this instance, a state actor. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 1:21 am
Again, this is another question which calls into consideration references for a preliminary ruling (still pending) before the CJEU: Case C-466/12 Svensson [here], Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment [here], and C-348/13 BestWater [here] for hyperlinking, and Case C-360/13 Meltwater [here] for internet browsing.Digital exhaustion: should you own your downloads? [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
However, even if the government has a substantial interest in protecting the state right of publicity, the provision is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
C. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The construction of a legal franework around a right to a healthy environment, and the role of the state as the responsible party, will continue to evolve.Most interesting, at least preliminarily, is the development of standards round the fundamental prevent-mitigate-remedy principle, and the development of standards for the calculation of damages. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
If so, I have good news. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:34 am
(c) It's been interesting to observe that a number of other countries appear to be intrigued by the idea of adopting their own versions of GILTI and the BEAT. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
As has been stated, the rewards shall also stand transferred along with the risk in a sale transaction. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:46 pm
C. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
I just came across the very interesting decision T 784/06 of an EPO Technical Board of Appeal, relating to the rather new scientific discipline of bioinformatics, i.e. the application of computing and mainly statistical methods to DNA sequencing, e.g within the framework of the Human Genome Project. [read post]
