Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF Z. C."
Results 81 - 100
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2020, 7:40 am
The CFPB states that the requirement to follow section 1026.43(c)(7) is “only for purposes of calculating monthly DTI, residual income, and monthly payment on the covered loan” and that “[m]ore generally, the Bureau emphasizes that [the final rule] requires only that the creditor “consider” the specified factors. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:16 am
Ambassador to Nigeria; Takwa Z. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am
State Department approved three arms packages for Taiwan. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
The claimant, Z, raised a further appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the ACA nowhere expressly states that other provisions depend on the mandate. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:21 am
When the only things I’m reading are my own posts and ideas, I’m not very interesting. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:07 pm
The third was delivered June 24, 2020 by National Security Advisor Robert C. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:47 pm
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (Regulation C). [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
” The test in this scenario is whether the employee acts “directly or indirectly in the interest” of the purported joint employer. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am
The court was prepared to accept that a section 8 notice was a demand for rent (citing C Y Property Mangement Ltd v Babalola. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am
Or a president who withholds federal highway funds earmarked for State X until the State agrees to disable some fraction of the voting machines in its big cities. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:25 am
Jillian C. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
” The US Copyright Office has refused to register the Milly Rock dance, writing that “[c]horeographic works are typically performed by skilled dancers for an audience. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Hickman, University of Minnesota Law School The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld statutory provisions calling for agencies to adopt such regulations as are “reasonable,” “feasible,” “in the public interest,” or some equally vague term—leading many commentators to declare that the nondelegation doctrine is dead. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
DefamationGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at an interesting decision from the Amsterdam district court which ordered Google to remove negative reviews from Google Maps's review section after concluding that they were fake.Economics and IPFormer PermaKat Nicola Searle shares her thoughts on the current state of the impact of economics on IP, and as a bonus asks for feedback from Kat readers.IP EducationThe IP Education Series is back! [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
The lower court summarily dismissed the petition and last week, in Sternlicht v Daniel Z. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Now what’s really interesting is that everything that makes sense from a business level raises compliance flags on a legal level. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
In that exercise, the home jurisdiction would recognize that instead of taxing z as under previous policy, the country would be able to tax x and [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am
Facebook is unhappy about the CJEU’s recent decision in Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Ltd (C 18/18), which held that the social media company could be ordered by member states to remove equivalent content, worldwide when content is deemed illegal in a member state. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 8:01 pm
The Tax Agency also refers to the recent cases decided by the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) with its judgement of February 26, 2019 in joined cases N Luxembourg 1 (C-115/16), X Denmark A/S (C-118/16), C Denmark 1 (C-119/16), Z Denmark ApS (C-299/6) (so called “Danish Cases)”. [read post]
