Search for: "STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. USA"
Results 81 - 100
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
South Carolina, 13-8037, another new relist, involves a constitutional challenge to a South Carolina statute (that state’s version of “Jessica’s Law”) that imposes mandatory GPS monitoring for released sex offenders. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 2:24 pm
Since it is unpublished, the opinion has no presidential value (i.e., it cannot be cited to any other South Carolina court), but its summary disposition is still a strong indicator of the way the wind blows in South Carolina. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
South Carolina – Ethics Regulators Question Lobbyist’s Campaign Contribution to S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
The first 83 cases, generally grouped by the State in which they each originated, are the legal actions filed since 2000 (of which I am aware) where the Episcopal Church (USA) and/or one of its dioceses played the role of plaintiff—the party who initiates a case in court by filing a complaint to seize the assets and real property of any church choosing to leave ECUSA. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Edwards involved a dispute between a bishop and a member of the clergy, not a dispute between a diocese and the national Church; (2) the case is being remanded to South Carolina State court, where the judges will follow the "neutral principles of law" approach adopted by the South Carolina Supreme Court in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Dane FreemanCase number: 10-cv-00701 (United States District Court for the District of South Carolina)Case filed: March 18, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 1, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-29 SEC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
America’s Best Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm
See Thompson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
The reason the South Carolina (or the Texas) federal court will stay the action as filed is so that the state court action, which began earlier, may finish first. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
Notice the deep disconnect here: the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina has existed continuously as an entity in South Carolina since 1785 -- before ECUSA itself ever came into being. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
The first 78 cases, grouped by the State in which they each originated, are the legal actions filed since 2000 (of which I am aware) where the Episcopal Church (USA) and/or one of its dioceses played the role of plaintiff—the party who initiates a case in court by filing a complaint to seize the assets and real property of any church choosing to leave ECUSA. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
Following the 4th Circuit’s decision in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
The deputation issued the following statement:Due to the actions of General Convention, the South Carolina Deputation has concluded that we cannot continue with business as usual. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
Francis v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:55 am
With award-winning floor-plans, the Company offers homes that incorporate exceptional value and quality to consumers in 16 states, including Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
